Most investment decisions are made on the wrong day.

The day a founder pitches, they’re at their most prepared, most polished, and most optimistic. You’re seeing them perform for you – not perform for customers.

We decided to watch founders compete for 52 weeks before anyone writes a cheque.

Turns out, that changes everything.

THE PROBLEM (Two-sided)

For founders

Traditional fundraising asks you to spend 40–50 hours a week in investor meetings, across 39 conversations on average, for a 5–10% success rate — while building nothing. You get good at pitching. You get bad at running a company.

The Startup Race asks you to do one thing: grow your revenue. Every week, for 52 weeks, in public, against your peers. No pitch decks. No investor meetings. No performing confidence you don’t yet have.

The competition generates investor interest. You just run your business.

For investors

The average angel portfolio has a 60–65% failure rate. Bottom-quartile angels barely break even. Top-quartile angels return 4–5X more – same asset class, same time period.

The difference isn’t luck. It isn’t connections. It’s information quality at the point of investment.

Research across 3,097 angel investments (Wiltbank & Boeker, 2007; Wiltbank, 2009, 2016) found that angels who spent 40+ hours on due diligence achieved 7.1X returns on average. Those who spent under 20 hours averaged 1.1X. That £340,000 performance gap (the distance between top and bottom quartile over a typical portfolio) is an information problem dressed up as a luck problem.

The Startup Race is an information solution.

THE INSIGHT NOBODY'S ACTING ON

Angels already know this. They just haven't applied it to the first cheque.

Here’s a fact about how sophisticated syndicates operate: follow-on investment decisions are based on 12–18 months of observed founder performance. Not pitches. Not promises. Behaviour under real conditions, over time.

The syndicate model already figured out that watching founders execute is better than listening to them present. They just didn’t apply that insight to initial investment.

We did.

The £100,000 Startup Race is, in essence, a 52-week due diligence process you watch rather than conduct – with verified revenue data, competitive pressure, and public accountability built in from day one.

You’re not backing a pitch. You’re investing in the founder who won.

HOW IT WORKS

One race. Fifty founders. Fifty-two weeks. One winner.

Entry: Founders must have a UK limited company, a minimum of £5,000 ARR, and accounting software connected directly to our platform. Revenue isn’t self-reported. It’s pulled automatically from business bank accounts via LivePlan integration. Founders cannot curate the numbers.

The competition: Each week, every founder’s cumulative revenue appears on a public league table, ranked against all other competitors. The Premier League (top 10) receives additional investor visibility. Founders know they’re being watched – by investors, by peers, by the public. That observation effect is not incidental. It’s the mechanism.

Behavioural science at work: The Hawthorne Effect tells us people perform differently under observation. Competitive arousal tells us head-to-head pressure surfaces exceptional performance. Costly signalling tells us that 52 weeks of verified revenue growth cannot be manufactured – which makes it a far more reliable signal than a 30-minute pitch. Loss aversion (the psychological pain of dropping in the rankings) drives sustained focus in ways that solo working never does.

The investment: The winning founder receives £100,000 in SEIS-eligible investment from our angel syndicate. Investors hold shares directly. Each receives their own SEIS3 certificate.

The SEIS advantage: For a 45% taxpayer investing £10,000, the maximum actual loss after SEIS Income Tax Relief (50%), Loss Relief, and CGT reinvestment relief is approximately £2,750. You’re not risking £10,000. You’re risking £2,750 — on a founder who has just publicly demonstrated 52 consecutive weeks of verified revenue growth under competitive pressure.

WHAT WE'VE PROVEN

The methodology works. Here's the evidence.

Previous Startup Race competitions have run at smaller prize levels. The progression (£1,000 race – 2020, £10,000 race – 2022, £100,000 race – 2026) represents systematic methodology development, not thin evidence. Each iteration extended the duration, raised the stakes, and refined the verification process.

CompetitionWinnerRevenue Growth During Race
£1,000 Startup Race (2020)Jonas Virsilas12X
£10,000 Startup Race (2022)Priyanshu Nath44X
£10,000 Startup Race (2022, runner-up)Mariely Macias Olmedo17X

The median UK early-stage startup grows revenue 2–3X annually. Our winners achieved 12–44X during competition.

We want to be precise about what this means. These are revenue growth figures during competition — not investment returns. Revenue growth does not guarantee investment returns, and we don’t yet have exit data from previous winners. What these figures demonstrate is that the competitive mechanism does what it’s designed to do: it surfaces founders with exceptional execution ability under sustained pressure. The investment case rests on the well-established correlation between information quality and angel investment outcomes — not on extrapolating revenue multiples into exit multiples.

We think that kind of intellectual honesty matters. You’re considering investing with us. You deserve accurate claims, not inflated ones.

THE TEAM

Who we are

James Shoemark — Co-Founder & CEO Serial entrepreneur. Community Education BA, University of Edinburgh. Level 3 Certified Leanstack Coach (trained directly by Ash Maurya, creator of Lean Canvas). Over 400 events delivered, 1,000+ founders coached, 76 startups graduated from accelerator programmes, 7 companies personally funded using this methodology since 2014. James has been running startup competitions and coaching founders for over a decade – and spent most of that time asking why the investment industry wasn’t using the performance data already in front of it.

Michael Clouser — Co-Founder Former VC. Academic entrepreneur at Cornell University and the University of Edinburgh. Mike brings the investor-side perspective: what angels actually need to see before writing a cheque, and why the due diligence process in its current form has systematic blind spots.

Dan Drummond — Co-Founder First Class Honours in Economics and Business Management, Heriot-Watt University. The quantitative conscience of the team.

THE TWO PATHS

Founders If you have a UK limited company, £5,000+ ARR, and the appetite to compete in public for 52 weeks — the £100,000 race launches in April 2026.

→ Register your interest

Investors If you’re already in an angel syndicate and wondering whether there’s a more reliable way to identify exceptional founders before you invest – read the investor memo.

→ Read the Investor Memo

Risk Warning: Investment in early-stage companies involves significant risks including illiquidity, lack of dividends, and potential total loss of investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Tax reliefs depend on individual circumstances and may change. Professional advice should be sought.

Regulatory compliance is maintained in accordance with FCA Article 48/50A exemptions. AML/KYC verification is required for all investors.

The Startup Race is based in Edinburgh, Scotland.